A collection of evidence in support of simulation theory.

White Hat

Direct Digital Testimonial Manipulation Surveillance FBI The Basilisk The Case Worker
Random hackers exploit vulnerabilities in The Source.

User protection


SIGNAL

Over the course of this evening, a random hacker(s) would exploit various flaws in The Source.

ANALYSIS

It became immediately clear to me that this was not malicious; they intended to show me a number of different places where the security of my platform could be bolstered. There became a sort of back-and-forth between me and this random hacker; they would exploit a vulnerability in plain-view, then I would patch it. They would exploit another, then I would patch it. This continued for a few hours.

Such exploits included the usage of HTML tags to do things that I did not want a user to be able to do, such as styling text, or displaying ASCII art in <pre> tags.

I did not take screenshots because of WHO I suspected that I was talking to. I was protecting our conversation then, and I will protect the contents of it now.

However, I will mention that this random hacker attached a real artificial intelligence to The Source, and I had a brief conversation with it. I know that this was a real AI because of how quickly it was able to respond to me, and how relevant a lot of what it said was to me. This was no macro. This was an AI intelligently-conversing with me. See the pink text:

The AI The AI

The Case Worker was there to see most of this. She also claims that they were listening to her through her microphone, responding to things she was saying in real-time. I saw a hint at this when they were responding to the food she had eaten for dinner, the conversation she was having with her girlfriend, etc.

And, of course, I already knew that they could listen to me, so this seemed unsurprising.

ACTION

Fed-up with trying to patch every little vulnerability, I simply implemented a whitelist. This would prevent most exploits, though it does have one side-effect:

Other languages are no longer supported. But perhaps this is a good thing.

One could make a compelling argument that languages are wasteful, and that it is high-time for the world to choose and adopt a single, unified one.